U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasq

Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasq
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 1996

Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasq

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1083

EULA DANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELIZABETH CITY-PASQUOTANK BOARD OF EDUCATION; JOSEPH W. PEEL, Doctor; CLEVELAND HAWKINS, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-1287

EULA DANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELIZABETH CITY-PASQUOTANK BOARD OF EDUCATION; JOSEPH W. PEEL, Doctor; CLEVELAND HAWKINS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-44-2-H2)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eula Dance, Appellant Pro Se. John David Leidy, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying re- lief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and granting in part the Appellees' motion for costs. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasquotank Bd. of Educ., No. CA-94-44-2-H2 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1995; Feb. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.