Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasq
Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasq
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1083
EULA DANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELIZABETH CITY-PASQUOTANK BOARD OF EDUCATION; JOSEPH W. PEEL, Doctor; CLEVELAND HAWKINS, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-1287
EULA DANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELIZABETH CITY-PASQUOTANK BOARD OF EDUCATION; JOSEPH W. PEEL, Doctor; CLEVELAND HAWKINS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-44-2-H2)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eula Dance, Appellant Pro Se. John David Leidy, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying re- lief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and granting in part the Appellees' motion for costs. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dance v. Elizabeth City-Pasquotank Bd. of Educ., No. CA-94-44-2-H2 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1995; Feb. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.