U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Meeker v. USAIR, Incorporated

Meeker v. USAIR, Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 1996

Meeker v. USAIR, Incorporated

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1140

THOMAS H. MEEKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus USAIR, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. H. Brent McKnight, Magis- trate Judge. (CA-94-216-3-MCK)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas H. Meeker, Appellant Pro Se. David Betts Hamilton, Amy Yager Jenkins, PETREE STOCKTON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in this employment discrim- ination action. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Meeker v. USAIR, Inc., No. CA-94-216-3-MCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.