U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Deloach v. Bass

Deloach v. Bass
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 1996

Deloach v. Bass

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8547

WILLIAM RAY DELOACH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN BASS; REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR SMITH; L. A. BROWN, C/O; LIEUTENANT HARRISON, C/O, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-972-2)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ray DeLoach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIUM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on November 8, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on December 14, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period de- prives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We there- fore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.