U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Wilford

United States v. Wilford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996

United States v. Wilford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-2455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD ANTHONY WILFORD, Claimant - Appellant, and $42,304.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-932-JFM) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Anthony Wilford, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the government's summary judgment motion and from the court's final decree of forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Ursery, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565 (U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.