U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Robertson

United States v. Robertson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996

United States v. Robertson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VERNON RAY ROBERTSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-261, CA-94-500-6)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Ray Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robertson, Nos. CR-93-261; CA-94-500-6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal as moot.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.