U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McNeill v. Morton

McNeill v. Morton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996

McNeill v. Morton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6402

MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEROME MORTON, Detective, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-6403

MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICKEY BIGGS, Detective, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-18-5-CT-BR, CA-96-19-5-CT-BR) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Eugene McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNeill v. Morton, No. CA-96-18-5-CT-BR; McNeill v. Biggs, No. CA-96-19-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.