U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Froeman v. Glendening

Froeman v. Glendening
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996

Froeman v. Glendening

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6542

GLENN A. FROEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARRIS N. GLENDENING; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 1875-L)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn A. Froeman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action seeking injunctive relief to stay an order of restitu- tion imposed by the state court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Froeman v. Glendening, No. CA-95-1875-L (D. Md. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.