U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Bates v. Breeze

Bates v. Breeze
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996

Bates v. Breeze

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6544

DEVONE BATES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JIMMIE GOOSBY; ROBERT KIRVEN, Plaintiffs, versus L. H. BREEZE; EUNICE BELVIN; UNKNOWN OR IDEN- TIFIED MEDICAL EMPLOYEES OF HENRICO COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-254-3) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devone Bates, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice for failure to provide the court with addresses of Defendants. The complaint may be saved by amendment. Thus, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.