U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Deel v. Holland

Deel v. Holland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1996

Deel v. Holland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1293

FRANKIE J. DEEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL HOLLAND; MARTY D. HUDSON; ELLIOTT SEGAL; JOSEPH J. STAHL, II, as Trustees of the 1974 Pension Plan, United Mine Workers of America; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-37-A)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie J. Deel, Appellant Pro Se. Matilda Ann Brodnax, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the denial of his request for disability retirement benefits from the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deel v. Holland, No. CA-94-37-A (W.D. Va. Feb. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.