Smith v. Banks
Smith v. Banks
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6528
JOSEPH P. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ED BANKS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-562-5-H)
Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph P. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is re- quired, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Banks, No. CA-95-562-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.