U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Sayko v. Lanham

Sayko v. Lanham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 1996

Sayko v. Lanham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6824

MICHAEL STEVEN SAYKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.; ALAN D. EASON; MARLENE LOUGAR; J. HEMLER; KATHY GRANT; STACE DONOHOO, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1055-AW) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Steven Sayko, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sayko v. Lanham, No. CA-96-1055-AW (D. Md. Apr. 17, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.