U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Odiana v. Rickards

Odiana v. Rickards
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 4, 1996

Odiana v. Rickards

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6520

ANTHONY IKEZAU ODIANA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLYN V. RICKARDS, Warden; BRIAN SMITH, Case Manager, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-112)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Ikezau Odiana, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Odiana v. Rickards, No. CA-96-112 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.