U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Young v. K-Mart Corporation

Young v. K-Mart Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 1996

Young v. K-Mart Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1220

CHARLES V. YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION; SUPER K-MART #3785; BILL WRIGHT; JOHN LEMRY; DAVE DAVIS; TERESA ROCKEFELLER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-1221

CHARLES V. YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION; SUPER K-MART #3785; BILL WRIGHT; BOB THORPE; SUE POLSTEN; DAVE DAVIS; TERESA ROCKEFELLER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (MISC-95-16-4, MISC-95-17-4)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before HALL, * MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles V. Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying in forma pauperis status in his suits against his former employer for employment discrimination. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. Young v. K-Mart Corp., Nos. MISC-95-16-4; MISC-95-17-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). See Roberts v. United States District Court, 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Judge Hall did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.