Wright v. Wallace
Wright v. Wallace
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6155
ROBERT WAYNE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN WALLACE; UNIT MANAGER HOWARD; LIEUTEN- ANT MARTIN; SERGEANT GLADMAN; OFFICER DAVIS; OFFICER THAMES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-222-0-8AJ) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Wayne Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Joseph Dawson Shine, Alexandria Skinner, SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) all of Appellant's claims, except for his claim that his placement in four-point restraints violated his constitutional rights. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocu- tory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motions for production of documents and for general relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.