U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Cupidon v. INS

Cupidon v. INS
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 13, 1996

Cupidon v. INS

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1214

SILVIE MARIE CUPIDON, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-508-519)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Silvie Marie Cupidon, Petitioner Pro Se. Richard Michael Evans, Donald Anthony Couvillon, Michelle Arlene Gluck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's decision and order affirming the immigration judge's decision find- ing the Appellant deportable, denying her applications for asylum and suspension of deportation, and granting her request for volun- tary departure. Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without rever- sible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition upon the reasoning of the Board. Cupidon v. INS, No. A70-508-519 (B.I.A. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.