U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Leach v. Whitaker

Leach v. Whitaker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1996

Leach v. Whitaker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6698

RAYMOND EUGENE LEACH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON S. WHITAKER; BOYD BENNETT; MICHAEL YORK; LYNN C. PHILLIPS; MILTON BRISCOE; MIKE O'BRIEN; VICK HAYNES; LINDA MCFADDER; WILLIE EDLEY; VAN PENNIGER; JOHN WATKINS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-503-5-BO)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Eugene Leach, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leach v. Whitaker, No. CA-95-503-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.