U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Pouncy v. Burson

Pouncy v. Burson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 3, 1996

Pouncy v. Burson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1989

GWENDOLYN POUNCY, Plaintiff - Appellant, and PAUL HODGES, Plaintiff, versus JOHN S. BURSON; WILLIAM M. SAVAGE; FIRST NA- TIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, American Housing Trust I, Boatmen's National Mortgage, Incorporated; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, (Aliases 1-50), Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-95-3611-DKC)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gwendolyn Pouncy, Appellant Pro Se. William Mapp Savage, SHAPIRO & BURSON, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders (1) dis- missing her complaint and denying her motion for a preliminary injunction and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouncy v. Burson, No. CA-95-3611-DKC (D. Md. May 16, 1996). Hodges' motion to intervene as a party to this appeal is hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.