U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Fuller v. Virginia

Fuller v. Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 3, 1996

Fuller v. Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1525

MICHAEL R. FULLER; NANCY J. HALSTEAD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; NLI/PLC/MACO III, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-421-A)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Fuller, Nancy J. Halstead, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re- lief on their request for preliminary injunctive relief or, in the alternative, a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v. Virginia, No. CA-96-421-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.