U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ojo v. George

Ojo v. George
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 2, 1996

Ojo v. George

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7913

ANTHONY KOLAWOLE OJO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAY GEORGE, Unit Manager; MICHAEL JONES, Case Counselor; Q. WOODWARD, JR., Case Counselor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-94-1611-9-6-JC)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Kolawole Ojo, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's report and recommen- dation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the report and recommendation is not appealable. This court may exer- cise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument and deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.