United States v. Tayo
United States v. Tayo
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6563
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GBOLAHAN FRANCIS TAYO, a/k/a Douglas Warren Johnson, a/k/a John Doe, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-95-28-BR, CA-95-106-5)
Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gbolahan Francis Tayo, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tayo, No. CR-95-28-BR; CA-95-106-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.