U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Lloyd v. Walker

Lloyd v. Walker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 1996

Lloyd v. Walker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6541

RICKEY R. LLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL WALKER; KEVIN HARRELLSON; ROBERT WHITE; JIMMY EVANS; SERGEANT DICKERSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-202-5-F)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Walker, No. CA-96-202-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar.

20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.