Frazier v. SC Dept Corr
Frazier v. SC Dept Corr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6648
FRANKLIN D. FRAZIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Parker Evatt, Commissioner; C.J. CEPAK, Warden at Broad River Correctional Institute; DR. HOLMES, (Orthopedic) at Byrnes Clinic in Columbia, South Carolina; LIEUTENANT MAZCK, Broad River R & E Center; LIEUTENANT KNOWLIN, Broad River Correctional Institute in official and individual capacity; CLIFFORD GLOVER; DR. ELLIOT; LINDA DUNLAP; SUSAN BRETZ; MRS. WILLIAMS; DR. BOULWARE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-95-218-3-6BC) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin D. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Frazier v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-218-3-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.