U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Brockington

United States v. Brockington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 9, 1996

United States v. Brockington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON BROCKINGTON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-90-100, CA-96-5-3)

Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Brockington, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Aaron Brockington appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brockington, Nos. CR-90-100; CA-96-5-3 (E.D. Va. April 10, 1996, May 9, 1996). We deny Brockington's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.