U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Tucker v. Dept of the Navy

Tucker v. Dept of the Navy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 9, 1996

Tucker v. Dept of the Navy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1420

LOYLESS B. TUCKER; DELMONT L. THOMPSON, SR.; JOHN E. SMITH; FRANK SIMMONS, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, and ORRIS CALDWELL, Plaintiff, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Charleston Naval Shipyard/Agency, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-2234-18AJ) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Loyless B. Tucker, Delmont L. Thompson, Sr., John E. Smith, Frank Simmons, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their civil action as barred. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the mag- istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-95-2234-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.