U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Fiorani v. Rust Federal Systems

Fiorani v. Rust Federal Systems
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 9, 1996

Fiorani v. Rust Federal Systems

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1933

ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUST FEDERAL SYSTEMS, Defendant - Appellee, and B. WILLIAM BASHEER; JACQUE L. BLUNDELL, Defendants.

No. 96-1995

ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CACI, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and TRACI BOWLES; KATHLEEN TRESIAK; WILLIAM J.

CLANCY, JR.; WOODSIDE EMPLOYMENT CONSULTANTS OF WASHINGTON, INCORPORATED; BABA IBRAHIM, Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, T. S. Ellis, III, District Judges. (CA-96-212-A, CA-95-1536-A) Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edward Findler, Arlington, Virginia; Allen Scott Rugg, KUTAK, ROCK, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals from the district court's orders denying his requests for hearing transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fiorani v. Rust Fed. Sys., No. CA- 96-212-A; Fiorani v. Caci, Inc., No. CA-95-1536-A (E.D. Va. June 26, 1996). We deny Appellee Caci, Inc.'s, motion to dismiss and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.