United States v. Howze
United States v. Howze
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6731
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
THEODORE HOWZE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-30-P, CA-95-432-3-P)
Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theodore Howze, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214,
motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Howze, Nos. CR-
92-30-P; CA-95-432-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished