U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Daniel v. U S Aty Office

Daniel v. U S Aty Office
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1996

Daniel v. U S Aty Office

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7059

LEONARD DANIEL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, U. S. Department of Justice, Agent Andre Clark, Atlanta, Georgia, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-339-5-HC-BR)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Daniel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daniel v. United States Attorney's Office, No. CA-96-339-5- HC-BR (E.D.N.C. June 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.