Tucker v. Seiber
Tucker v. Seiber
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6523
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT SEIBER; CUSTODIAN FOX; SERGEANT AUSTIN; MCWILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-215-CRT-F)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for reconsideration of the entry of a pre-filing injunction.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Tucker v. Seiber, No. CA-93-215-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished