U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Shippy v. Harold

Shippy v. Harold
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 1996

Shippy v. Harold

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6748

PERRY SHIPPY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. HAROLD; D. MOSS; C. EVANS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-307)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L.

No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v. Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.