Shippy v. Harold
Shippy v. Harold
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6748
PERRY SHIPPY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. HAROLD; D. MOSS; C. EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-307)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-
lief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v.
Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished