Shippy v. Harold

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Shippy v. Harold

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6748

PERRY SHIPPY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. HAROLD; D. MOSS; C. EVANS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-307)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,

Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110

Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v.

Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished