Pritchard v. Allen
Pritchard v. Allen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6712
JESSE JAMES PRITCHARD, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE ALLEN; ED MURRAY; E. C. MORRIS; L. M. SAUNDERS; STU TAYLOR; MAJOR DAY; D. BOYERS, Captain; LIEUTENANT BOYERS; CAPTAIN HALLOWAY; LIEUTENANT LYLES; SERGEANT SPROUSE; GUARD PERRY; GUARD SILVEA; INVESTIGATOR DURY; RONALD ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-319-R)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Pritchard v. Allen, No. CA-95-319-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished