Pritchard v. Allen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pritchard v. Allen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6712

JESSE JAMES PRITCHARD, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE ALLEN; ED MURRAY; E. C. MORRIS; L. M. SAUNDERS; STU TAYLOR; MAJOR DAY; D. BOYERS, Captain; LIEUTENANT BOYERS; CAPTAIN HALLOWAY; LIEUTENANT LYLES; SERGEANT SPROUSE; GUARD PERRY; GUARD SILVEA; INVESTIGATOR DURY; RONALD ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-319-R)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Pritchard v. Allen, No. CA-95-319-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished