Beamon v. Angelone
Beamon v. Angelone
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6851
JOHN BEAMON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; F. G. SETTLE; C. D. LARSEN; Y. SCOTT; L. M. SAUNDERS; J. LEE; F. S. TAYLOR; M. NEELEY; J. CARUSO; V. V. GRANT; JOHN B. METZGER, III; SANDRA COMBS; WINNIE R. DIXON; JOSEPH F. LEWIS; LINDA R. PITMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-1024-R)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Beamon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Beamon v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1024-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished