United States v. Kinney
United States v. Kinney
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6666
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEMUEL KINNEY,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-94-57-A, CA-95-1697-AM)
Submitted: October 8, 1996 Decided: October 22, 1996
Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lemuel Kinney, Appellant Pro Se. Natalia Combs Greene, William T. Henderson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lemuel Kinney appeals from the district court's order dis-
missing his motion under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 114. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Kinney, Nos. CR-94-57-A; CA-95-1697-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1996).
Kinney's motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished