United States v. Coor
United States v. Coor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6713
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEAUTANOUS COOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-72-5-F, CA-95-974-5-F)
Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: November 1, 1996
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beautanous Coor, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jolly, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion for reconsideration of the court's earlier order denying his
various motions, including a motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of dis-
cretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Coor, Nos. CR-92-72-5-F; CA-95-974-5-F
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, Feb. 5, & Apr. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished