King v. Ives
King v. Ives
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2120
JOAN A. KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ROBERT L. STEPHENSON,
Plaintiff,
versus
PERRY N. IVES; PORETSKY MANAGEMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1931-AW)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: November 1, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joan A. King, Appellant Pro Se. H. Patrick Donohue, ARMSTRONG, DONOHUE, & CEPPOS, CHARTERED, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal
period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an
extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day
period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to
relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections,
434 U.S. 257, 264(1978) (quoting
United States v. Robinson,
361 U.S. 220, 229(1960)). The district
court entered its order on June 26, 1996; Appellant's notice of
appeal was filed on August 2, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a
timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dis-
miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished