Powe v. Angelone
Powe v. Angelone
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7084
TYRONE DOUGLAS POWE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD ANGELONE, Director,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-124-3)
Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: October 30, 1996
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Douglas Powe, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's* order deny- ing relief on his habeas corpus petition,
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994),
as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Powe
v. Angelone, No. CA-96-124-3 (E.D. Va. June 17, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished