United States v. Thomas
United States v. Thomas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CRAIG LAWRENCE THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-475-HAR, CA-96-136-HAR)
Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 7, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Lawrence Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Allen Bonner, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, Nos. CR-90-475-HAR; CA-96-136-HAR (D. Md. June 19, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.