Mundy v. Chater, Commissioner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 7, 1996

Opinion

No. 96-1219

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-343-3)

Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 7, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

McArthur C. Mundy, III, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephen Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order upholding

the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of disability insur-

ance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Mundy v. Chater, No. CA-95-343-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.