Bunch v. Bray
Bunch v. Bray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2007
SHELTINA BUNCH; WILLIAM BUNCH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
KEVIN BRAY; JAMES HENNING; CITY OF ELIZABETH CITY, NORTH CAROLINA; HERMAN L. BUNCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-30-2-H)
Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 7, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheltina Bunch, William Bunch, Appellants Pro Se. Donald Carpenter Prentiss, John David Leidy, HORHNTAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Eliza- beth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting
Defendants' motion for summary judgment in their civil action. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Bunch v. Bray, No. CA-95-30-2-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished