United States v. Evans
United States v. Evans
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6168
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ST. MATTHEW TROY EVANS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-116-JFM, CA-95-3123-JFM)
Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
St. Matthew Troy Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
St. Matthew Troy Evans appeals the denial of his motion filed
pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat.
1214. In his motion, Evans claimed that his attorney was ineffec-
tive for failing to note an appeal following sentencing on cocaine
conspiracy charges. We affirm.
In his plea agreement, Evans waived his appellate rights
under
18 U.S.C. § 3742(1994), reserving only his right to appeal an upward departure from the guideline range. See
18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(3). In the subject case, the district court stated at
sentencing that it was departing downward from Evans' guideline
range of 87-108 months. Evans received a three-month departure and was sentenced to 84 months in prison.
Evans' waiver was valid and enforceable. His claim that his
attorney was ineffective for failing to note an appeal is without merit because Evans expressly waived his right to appeal anything
other than an upward departure and, in this case, there was no
upward departure.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Leave to
proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished