United States v. Riddick

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Riddick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6983

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KELVIN RIDDICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-9-N, CA-96-197-2)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132,

110 Stat. 1214

. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Riddick, Nos. CR-92-9-N; CA-96-197-2 (E.D. Va. May 28, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished