Pierce v. Jones

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pierce v. Jones

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6592

RICKY A. PIERCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PEGGY JONES; DEBORAH ADLES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-68-5-BO)

Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CARO- LINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Jones, No. CA-94-68-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished