Green v. Garraghty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Green v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7123

GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden of Greensville,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-436-2)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Samuel Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Garraghty, No. CA-96-

436-2 (E.D. Va. May 22 & July 5, 1996). We also deny Appellant's

motions for psychiatric assistance, counsel, and an evidentiary

hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished