Zulu X v. Moore
Zulu X v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6380
SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, formerly known as Michael Wayne Montgomery,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL B. MOORE; LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; DEPUTY WARDEN WESSIGNER; V. JACKSON, Prison Guard,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-6433
SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE; LAURIE BESSINGER; VAUGHN JACKSON, Captain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1605-6-3AK, CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK) Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996
Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate
judge's recommendations and find that the complaints, and these
appeals, are frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Zulu X v. Moore, No. CA-95-1605-6-3AK; X v.
Doe, No. CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK (D.S.C. Feb. 28 & Mar. 13, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2 3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished