Zulu X v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Zulu X v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6380

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, formerly known as Michael Wayne Montgomery,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL B. MOORE; LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; DEPUTY WARDEN WESSIGNER; V. JACKSON, Prison Guard,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-6433

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE; LAURIE BESSINGER; VAUGHN JACKSON, Captain,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1605-6-3AK, CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK) Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendations and find that the complaints, and these

appeals, are frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Zulu X v. Moore, No. CA-95-1605-6-3AK; X v.

Doe, No. CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK (D.S.C. Feb. 28 & Mar. 13, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 3

Reference

Status
Unpublished