Weidlich v. Trent
Weidlich v. Trent
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6682
ARTHUR R. WEIDLICH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE TRENT, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-7-2)
Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur R. Weidlich, Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994), amended by Anti- terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
132,
110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weidlich v. Trent,
No. CA-95-7-2 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished