U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Marquez-Ramos

United States v. Marquez-Ramos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 19, 1996

United States v. Marquez-Ramos

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6622

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARIO ALONSO MARQUEZ-RAMOS, a/k/a Cheeseman, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-303-S, CA-94-209-4)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Alonso Marquez-Ramos, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his mo- tion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the recommenda- tions of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Marquez-Ramos, Nos. CR-90-303-S; CA-94-209-4 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 1995; Apr. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.