United States v. Francis
United States v. Francis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6641
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GLENN MORGAN FRANCIS, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-177-R, CA-94-341-R)
Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn Morgan Francis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order and order on
reconsideration denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Francis, Nos. CR-90-177-R; CA-94-341-R
(W.D. Va. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished