Sado v. Marx

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sado v. Marx

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2126

NEGUSSIE SADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LELAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

RONALD MARX; EDMUND PETERS; TED LEWIS; CHRIS- TOPHER PICKWICK; LINDA HERFORD; WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 94-2959-PJM)

Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Negussie Sado, Appellant Pro Se. R. Dennis Osterman, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel-

lee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's suit

filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sado v. Marx, No. CA-94-2959-PJM (D. Md. July 26, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished