Sado v. Marx
Sado v. Marx
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2126
NEGUSSIE SADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LELAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee, and RONALD MARX; EDMUND PETERS; TED LEWIS; CHRIS- TOPHER PICKWICK; LINDA HERFORD; WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 94-2959-PJM) Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996
Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Negussie Sado, Appellant Pro Se. R. Dennis Osterman, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sado v. Marx, No. CA-94-2959-PJM (D. Md. July 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.