Howard v. Smith
Howard v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6716
RONALD EUGENE HOWARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CA-95-3507-AMD)
Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Eugene Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason-
ing of the district court. Howard v. Smith, No. CA-95-3507-AMD (D.
Md. Apr. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished