U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Waller v. Wella Corporation

Waller v. Wella Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1996

Waller v. Wella Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1738

MARGARET E. WALLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WELLA CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-995-R)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Margaret E. Waller, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sharon Smith Goodwyn, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the employer's motion for summary judgment in this Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12117 (West 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason- ing of the district court. Waller v. Wella Corp., No. CA-95-995-R (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.